International Minerals News Release: Revised - International Minerals Announces Addendum to Preliminary Feasibility Study and Updated Gold Resource Estimates at Gaby Project, Ecuador

International Minerals Corporation (TSX:IMZ) (Zurich (SIX):IMZ) revises and replaces previous news release dated January 26^th, 2009 and reports the results of an internally-prepared addendum study to the previously released preliminary feasibility study and an updated mineral resource estimate for the Gaby Gold porphyry deposit ("Gaby Project”) in southern Ecuador. The Gaby Project is currently on hold pending the expiry of a Mining Mandate (which has suspended all exploration and production activities in Ecuador since April 2008) and the approval of a new mining law, which is expected in the coming weeks.

Preliminary Feasibility Study Addendum

The results of a Preliminary Feasibility Study ("PFS”) for the Gaby Project, announced in an IMZ news release on February 11, 2008, showed that at a base case gold price of $650 per ounce ("/oz”) and a 20,000 tonnes per day ("tpd”) tonnage throughput, an open pit gold mining project did not return positive cash flow and therefore IMZ was unable to report a mineral reserve estimate.

Since then, a more detailed project sensitivity study has been undertaken by IMZ to determine an optimal scale for the mining operation and process flowsheet in order to lower operating costs and benefit from improved economies of scale. For the sensitivity study, tonnage throughputs were considered at 20,000 tpd (the base case for the PFS), 40,000 tpd, 60,000 tpd and 80,000 tpd, using gold prices ranging from $750/oz to $1,500/oz.

IMZ has concluded that a stable gold price at or above $1,000/oz would be sufficient to merit initiation of a final feasibility study for the Gaby Project (assuming a positive outcome relating to the new mining law in Ecuador).

The range of tonnages and operating costs shown in Table 1 were used to generate various optimized pit models (or "shells”) from the updated mineral resource estimate discussed below.

Table 1. Operating and Capital Cost Estimates for Preliminary Feasibility Study (PFS) Base Case and Sensitivities

Table 2 below indicates the sensitivity to higher gold prices and increased tonnage throughputs on the economics of the Gaby Project, with a tonnage throughput of 60,000 tpd being at or close to the optimal case at a gold price of $1,000 per ounce. The PFS base case is shown in bold.

The sensitivity case that is expected to become the basis for a final feasibility study, should one be initiated, selected by IMZ is 60,000 tpd at $1,000/oz gold, which could yield a cash flow of US$916 million over a 16-year mine life at an estimated capital cost of US$900 million and could recover approximately 5.3 million gold ounces at an average annual production of approximately 330,000 ounces of gold. The Net Present value (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is approximately US$331 million and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is approximately 11%. At a gold price of $750, the 60,000 tpd case would lose US$340 million. The project could break even at a gold price of approximately $850/oz.

Table 2. Results of Gaby Project Pit Optimizations at Various Tonnage Rates and Gold Prices.

Processing

Following completion of the PFS in early 2008, a decision was taken by IMZ to focus the project on conventional processing methods using crushing/milling, agitation leaching, carbon-in-leach ("CIL”), carbon stripping, electrowinning and smelting to produce doré bars on site for shipping to a refinery. This process option does not recover copper.

The sensitivity studies assume using semi-autogenous grinding and recycle crushing followed by ball milling, but it should be noted that secondary and tertiary crushing and screening followed by ball milling is still an option being contemplated by IMZ.

Updated Mineral Resource Estimates

Based on additional drill results received after the issuance of the February 11, 2008 news release, an updated mineral resource estimate has been calculated, which was used in the sensitivity study described above.

The updated combined Measured and Indicated ("M&I”) Resources are now estimated by FSS Canada, an independent consulting firm, at approximately 356 million tonnes ("Mt”) at an average grade of 0.61 grams per tonne ("g/t”) gold containing approximately 6,940,000 ounces of gold (with approximately 4.6 million ounces of gold attributable to IMZ).

This updated M&I Resource estimate of 6.94 million gold ounces represents an 11% increase in M&I Resources compared to the February 2008 estimate of approximately 6.2 million ounces of gold contained within 308 Mt at an average grade of 0.63 g/t gold. Approximately 3.8 million ounces of gold were attributable to IMZ based on its property ownership at that time compared to the new estimate of 4.6 million ounces, which represents an approximate 21% increase in attributable M&I Resources for IMZ.

Additional updated Inferred Resources are estimated to be 140 Mt at an average grade of 0.62 g/t gold containing approximately 2.9 million ounces of gold (with approximately 2.2 million ounces of gold attributable to IMZ). This new resource estimate represents a 13% increase in Inferred Resources compared to the February 2008 estimate of 2.6 million ounces of gold contained within 122 Mt at an average grade of 0.65 g/t. Approximately 1.7 million were attributable to IMZ and that time compared to the new estimate of 2.2 million ounces, which represents an approximate 29% in attributable Inferred Resources for IMZ.

The resource estimate discussed above and shown in Table 3 is reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4 g/t gold, which approximates the cut-off grade for the open-pit mining and conventional milling/CIL process option selected for the Gaby Project using a base-case gold price of US$650 per ounce. Because the cut-off grade is a factor of operating costs, metallurgical recoveries and gold price, it is possible that a lower or higher cut-off grade could be applied in the future.

IMZ holds variable interests (ranging from 55% to 100%) in the three principal mining concessions that comprise the Gaby Project. A summary of the mineral resource estimates using a range of gold cut-off grades (with the base case in bold print) is provided in Table 3 below, including the total contained project ounces and the ounces attributable to IMZ.

Table 3. Gaby Project – Mineral Resource Estimates (as of January 26, 2009 at US$650 gold)

The mineral resources were estimated based on IMZ’s previously-released assay results from 297 core drill holes and 188 reverse circulation drill holes totaling approximately 81,200m, which produced an average drill spacing of 50 - 70m. These mineral resources were classified in accordance with CIM guidelines by FSS’s Qualified Person, R. Mohan Srivastava (P.Geo.), and the estimate has an effective date of January 26, 2009.

Resource Estimation Methodology

Mineral resources were estimated using geostatistical interpolation methods within each of the two principal geological domains: (a) the near-surface saprolite (oxidized) zone and (b) the underlying sulfide zone. The saprolite zone averages approximately 15m in thickness and accounts for only about 5% of the total contained gold at the Gaby Project and is included in the overall resource estimate shown in Table 3.

Within the saprolite domain, ordinary kriging was used to interpolate the gold grade. Within the sulfide domain, "Probability Assisted Constrained Kriging”, a combination of indicator kriging and ordinary kriging, was used.

Ordinary kriging was used to interpolate gold grades for four separate sub-domains that may intermix within each block (block size is 20m by 20m by 10m high). The four sub-domains were defined by kriging indicators of the intensity of mineralization that were based on the geological characteristics that best separate weak mineralization from strong mineralization. The kriged indicator values provide estimates of the probability or proportion of each sub-domain within each block. The grades of each sub-domain were interpolated separately, using only the nearby data from the same sub-domain, and the final block grade was calculated by taking the proportion and density weighted average of the grades from each of the sub-domains.

Resources were classified according to the number of nearby drill holes, their proximity to the block being estimated, and their spatial arrangement around the block. Blocks that were surrounded by data and that had four or more drill holes within the range of the variogram were classified as Measured Resources. Blocks were classified as Indicated Resources if they were surrounded by data and had two or more drill holes within the range of the variogram, or if the block was actually pierced by a drill hole. Blocks were classified as Inferred Resources if they had data within the range of the variogram but could not be classified as Measured or Indicated.

General

Drilling at the Gaby Project was carried out by Paragon Drilling Ecuador S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Major Drilling of Canada. Sample preparation was carried out by ALS Chemex in Quito, Ecuador using standard industry practices. Analytical work was carried out by ALS Chemex in Lima, Peru using conventional fire assay methods for gold. For quality control purposes, analytical standards with known metal values were included with IMZ’s samples submitted for assay. The overall drilling program was supervised by IMZ’s Qualified Person, Technical Manager Nick Appleyard, who reviewed the foregoing disclosure.

For additional information, contact Wendy Yang at Tel: (303) 357-4863
Internet Site: http://www.intlminerals.com

Cautionary Statement:

Some of the statements contained in this release are "forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian securities law requirements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this release include statements regarding mining law outcome; estimates of capital and operating costs; returns, net asset value and break-even; timing and significance of future cash flows and revenue from the project; timing and outcome of any feasibility study; and timing and scale of production and processing; and resources estimates. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results include risks and uncertainties such as: risks relating to estimates of production and processing rates; risks relating to estimates of mineral resources and reserves; risks relating to capital and operating costs; risks relating to obtaining mining and environmental permits; mining and development risks; risk of commodity price fluctuations; political and regulatory risks; and other risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s Renewal Annual Information Form for the year ended June 30, 2008, which is available at www.sedar.com under the Company’s name. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.