19.11.2012 20:16:00
|
Annington Limited -- Moody's assigns (P)Caa1 rating to Annington Finance No. 5 plc's proposed GBP500 million PIK toggle notes
London, 19 November 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today assigned a first-time corporate family rating (CFR) of B1 and probability of default rating (PDR) of B3 to Annington Limited ("Annington Ltd"). In addition, the agency has assigned a provisional (P)Caa1 rating to the proposed GBP500 million PIK toggle notes maturing in 2022, to be issued by Annington Finance No. 5 plc ("the Issuer").
The PIK notes will be (1) guaranteed by the Issuer's immediate parent company, Annington Homes Limited (AHL), and AHL's parent company, Annington Ltd; (2) secured via share pledges of the Issuer and AHL and sister companies Annington Rentals (Holdings) Ltd (ARHL), Annington Developments (Holdings) Ltd (ADHL) and Annington Subsidiary Holdings Ltd (ASHL); and (3) secured by a first-ranking security interest in the proceeds loan from the Issuer to AHL. The outlook on the ratings is stable.
Moody's issues provisional ratings in advance of the final sale of securities and these ratings reflect Moody's preliminary credit opinion regarding the transaction. Upon the issuance of the notes and a conclusive review of the final documentation, Moody's will endeavour to assign a definitive rating to the notes. A definitive rating may differ from the provisional rating.
RATINGS RATIONALE
Annington Ltd is a newly formed intermediate holding company within the Annington corporate group ("Annington"). Consolidated accounts, historically reported by Annington Holdings plc, will in future be reported by Annington Ltd. with what Moody's understands to be non-material differences. Annington Ltd's CFR is underpinned by the core business of the corporate group -- a large, granular portfolio of residential properties located largely in southern England where occupier demand and house prices are the highest in the country. Consolidated total assets were reported at GBP4.84 billion at financial year-end 31 March 2012. Rental income from the core business is secure and stable; it is derived from the long lease (999 years) and leaseback (200 years) transaction completed between the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Annington in 1996. The lease agreement allows for rents to grow in line with estimated market rents but are then subject to a contractual discount. Leases on any of the properties can be terminated ("released") by the MoD with six months notice at which time the freehold interest to these properties is handed back to Annington. However, due to rent being payable at a discount, the housing stock has greater value with the benefit of vacant possession. Annington has a track record of consistently refurbishing and selling "released" homes at a profit, achieving sales prices close to market value. In addition, asset values over the long term have benefited from the favourable supply and demand imbalance in the UK housing market, particularly within its market niche which is for affordable homes and first time buyers.
Annington Ltd's activities are not widely diversified but include two other smaller related businesses: ARHL, which owns and manages a smaller portfolio of residential investment properties that are leased to private individuals and Housing Associations at market rent; and ADHL, which redevelops some of the larger sites released from the MoD, largely in joint venture with external business partners.
Annington Ltd's CFR is constrained by an aggressive financial policy, illustrated by the quantum and purpose of the PIK notes, which is to part-finance the buy-back of Nomura's shareholding in Annington. The group's financial policy has already led to very weak overall fixed charge coverage, as measured by adjusted EBITDA/gross interest expense (including amortisation of the discount from the zero-coupon bonds) plus ground rents estimated at 0.6x for the first half-year to 30 September 2012 and 0.5x for the financial year 2011/12. Another contributing factor to the weak coverage is the fine yield produced by its low-risk residential investments.
ARHL has c. GBP124 million outstanding debt at 30 September 2012, secured by its property assets with interest payable in cash. However, the group's core business (held in ASHL) raised finance through a whole business securitisation (WBS), with WBS debt reported in the accounts at GBP2.1 billion at 30 September 2012. The WBS cannot cash pay all its interest expense due to the high level of indebtedness relative to income and cash flow generation. This has been accommodated with the issuance of zero-coupon bonds for a portion of the WBS debt. The proposed PIK toggle notes to be issued by Annington Finance No. 5, a company external to the WBS, are forecast to accrue rather than pay interest for at least the next five years.
In addition, leverage as measured by adjusted net debt/recurring EBITDA was extremely high at c. 30.7x for the 2011/12 financial year ending 31 March 2012 compared to 16.5x for 2010/11 - the difference being largely due to a GBP79 million fair value write down of interest rate swaps in 2011/12. At 30 September 2012, Annington Ltd's effective leverage, as measured by adjusted consolidated debt/ total assets, was moderate at c. 48%; but following the issuance of the PIK, pro forma effective leverage is estimated to rise immediately to a much higher level of c. 59% (all data and ratios as adjusted by Moody's).
Annington Ltd's B3 PDR is two notches lower than the B1 CFR, given the rating agency's view of a higher than average recovery rate in the event of default. In Moody's opinion, there is a high degree of refinancing risk at maturity. The amount of PIK notes outstanding at maturity will depend on the level of interest accrued. This in turn will be a function of the volume of property releases from the MoD and management's ability to continue realising close to the portfolio's fair value with the benefit of vacant possession (reported as 98% on an historic average basis since 2000 by Annington) , thus raising additional cashflow to service debt. However, should an event of default result in the disposal of group's assets, by virtue of their valuation and the quality of the MoD as tenant of the core business, this would be likely to support higher than average recovery levels on the PIK toggle notes than would usually be experienced by creditors under such circumstances.
The PIK notes (P) Caa1 instrument rating has been notched down from the CFR to reflect its subordinated status. A contractual restricted group for the PIK issuance will be created that includes its immediate parent AHL and sister companies ARHL, ADHL and ASHL. (ASHL is the holding company of the WBS). The PIK notes will be secured only by the proceeds loan from the Issuer to AHL and a charge on the shares of the above-mentioned members of the restricted group. The PIK notes will not be collateralised by a charge on any of the restricted group's assets. In the event of default, any recovery made by the PIK note holders will be effectively and structurally subordinated to the claims of investors in the WBS notes and lenders of ARHL and its subsidiaries' secured banking facilities.
The group's liquidity is supported by the strong cash flow generated from the rental income of its core business and management's reported track record in selling released assets at an average of 98% of value with the benefit of vacant possession. Liquidity is adequate for the next 12 to 18 months insofar as the WBS has been enhanced by liquidity facilities to avoid payment default and the financing structure contains zero-coupon bonds, thereby enabling rental income from the MoD to cover all contractual debt servicing. In addition, the PIK toggle notes can accrue interest if cashflow from future MoD releases is insufficient to cash pay. Furthermore, ARHL's secured cash pay bank loans are set at levels that can be serviced by ARHL income. Headroom under ARHL's bank loans leverage and interest cover covenants is adequate at present, with the minimum headroom for any one covenant at 30 September 2012 at around 17%.
The stable rating outlook assumes that over time Annington Ltd's fixed charge coverage will trend towards 1.0x, liquidity will remain adequate on a forward-looking basis of 12 to 18 months, including but not limited to adequate headroom under the group's various financial covenants.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN
Although unlikely in the near term, upward pressure on the rating could arise when Annington Ltd's leverage materially declines enabling it to cash pay the interest expense on the PIK notes on a sustainable basis.
Negative pressure on the rating could arise if any of the companies outside or within the restricted group of the WBS issue debt or their assets suffer from a decline in fair market value such that Annington Ltd's adjusted debt/total assets trends towards 70%, which in turn decreases the notes' estimated recovery given default as well as increasing refinancing risk beyond current expectations. A deterioration in credit quality of the WBS could also result in negative pressure on the rating. Negative pressure could also arise if (1) interest cover does not gradually improve towards 1.0x; or (2) any liquidity challenges develop that are not adequately addressed.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in rating Annington Ltd was Moody's Approach for REITs and Other Commercial Property Firms Industry Methodology published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Established in 1996, Annington is an unlisted property investment group that primarily owns around 40,000 residential units leased to the UK'sMinistry of Defence and reported consolidated total assets of GBP4.84 billion at financial year-end 31 March 2012.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entities or their designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare each of the ratings are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entities, obligations or credits satisfactory for the purposes of issuing these ratings.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning the ratings is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entities or their related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Lynn Valkenaar Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Paloma San Valentin MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.